Rapid developments in the field of artificial intelligence have created numerous challenges for legal systems, especially in the field of intellectual property. While traditional intellectual property laws emphasize human creativity, the emergence of artificial intelligence systems that are capable of producing creative works and independent innovations has challenged the concept of the creator of the work and the material and moral rights. This research aims to conduct a comparative analysis of the legal frameworks of Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Malaysia in the field of intellectual property of works produced by artificial intelligence and attempts to identify the strengths and weaknesses of these legal systems. The present research was conducted using a comparative analysis method and used documentary and library studies to examine the laws related to intellectual property in four selected countries. The jurisprudential and legal foundations of each country, the existing legal frameworks, and their interaction with international treaties were analyzed, and then the results were presented in the form of a comparative comparison. The findings of the research show that the countries under study have different approaches in dealing with works produced by artificial intelligence. Malaysia, due to its combination of English legal system and Shafi’i jurisprudence, is the leading country in developing modern frameworks to support digital innovation. In contrast, Iran, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia still face a lack of specific laws and legal ambiguity in this area.