نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Basically, rule-making regarding the multiplicity of crimes is done in substantive criminal law, but the way of preliminary investigation (as part of formal law) is also affected by it. However, formal criminal law determines the implementation of substantive criminal law. In this way, dealing with the effect of multiplicity of crimes in investigative measures in the law of Afghanistan and Iran is one of the main goals of this research.The results of this descriptive-analytical research show that the laws of Afghanistan and Iran, with the exception of the provision of criminal protection, are faced with legal loopholes in the case of multiplicity of crimes, and there is a field of voting fraud. What the current research emphasizes is that the material multiplicity of the crime causes the multiplicity of accusations, the issuance of criminal security orders (as it is within the inherent jurisdiction of different courts) and the orders are final, even if the accused is finally sentenced to severe punishment. In the credit multiplicity of the crime, it is necessary to explain the charge of the material behavior of the crime and issue a criminal provision order regarding the serious crime. However, in relation to the issuing of final decisions, the investigating authority must comment on all the titles and results because it is necessary to sentence the perpetrator to a severe punishment in the assumption of the multiplicity of credit of the crime, specifying the serious title or result. Due to the fact that it is necessary to condemn the perpetrator to a severe punishment in the assumption of multiplicity of crime, the title or result of the seriousness must be specified.
کلیدواژهها English
