Comparative Studies on Islamic Countries Law

Comparative Studies on Islamic Countries Law

A Comparative Perspective on the Concept of Parliamentary Oversight in the Constitutional Rights System of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Republic of Iraq: Reconstruction as a Structural Right of Citizens to Accountability of Public Power

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Public law, NT.C, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of law, ET.C, Isalmic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Department of Public law, NT.C, Islamic Azad University, Tehran,. Iran.
Abstract
Monitoring and inspection as one of the main components of management, according to its level, scope and scope, has different types, the purpose of all of which is to ensure the correct performance of the activity or work. Supervision can be classified from different perspectives. One of these types is the division of supervision into two general types: "government supervision" and "popular supervision". In fact, the main concern of this research is the answer to the question, how is the public opinion on the actions of the executive branch in the laws of Iran and Iraq? This research was done with descriptive-analytical method and with available library and internet resources. The findings of the research emphasize the hypothesis that the supervision of the actions of the executive branch takes place in two forms: public and popular supervision and legal supervision. The means of public and popular supervision over the actions of the executive branch are: elections, parties and associations, media, marches and demonstrations. The important guarantees of monitoring the performance of the executive branch are stated in the constitution, which are: a- the people (the subject of the eighth article of the constitution), b- the Islamic Council (article 90) and c- the judiciary (article 156).
Keywords
Subjects


Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 19 June 2026